Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Google Can Now Execute AJAX and JavaScript For Indexing


This morning we reported that the comments on Facebook are being indexed by Google. Google’s Matt Cutts just confirmed on Twitter that Google is now able to “execute AJAX/JS to index some dynamic comments.”
This gives Google’s spider, GoogleBot, the ability to read comments in AJAX or JavaScript, such as Facebook comments or Disqus comments and others that are dynamically loaded via AJAX or JavaScript. In addition, this means, Google is better at seeing the content behind more of your JavaScript or AJAX.


Postscript: Google now has an official blog post up with more details.

Story Link : http://searchengineland.com/google-can-now-execute-ajax-javascript-for-indexing-99518

Monday, September 12, 2011

What Is Search Engine Optimization? The Three Minute Video!

What Is Search Engine Optimization? The Three Minute Video!

Don’t know SEO? Know someone who needs a short, easy to understand overview of search engine optimization and how it works?




Grab some popcorn and watch our new SEO video, which in just three minutes covers the basics of search engine optimization:
I’m really pleased with how the video turned out, and I hope you are, too. We worked withCommon Craft to produce it, and they have many more great explainer videos like this in theirCommon Craft video library, so check that out!
You’ll find our video on YouTube in our Search Engine Land channel, and it also has a permanent home here on Search Engine Land as part of our What Is SEO / Search Engine Optimization? page.
If you haven’t visited that page, do check it out. It also provides background our about our more in-depth Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors, links to free guides about SEO, resources here at Search Engine Land and across the web on the topics.
Hey, if you like that page, links and social shares to it are appreciated!
By the way, if you’re a Search Engine Land member, don’t forget a new feature we’ve added — our Search Engine Land Guide To SEO as a downloadable eBook. It’s just one of many benefits you get. Not a member? Consider signing-up!

Friday, September 9, 2011

Foursquare: More Than Fun and Games, A Potent Local Search Tool

Foursquare: More Than Fun & Games, A Potent Local Search Tool

About a year ago, I was feeling Foursquare fatigue. Why on earth was I checking in? The badges were harder to get, and I wasn’t going to ever “win” in some places. But now I win all the time, through tips and specials that have been added. Welcome to the new Foursquare.
It’s not like Foursquare has suddenly made these changes. There’s been a constant stream of announcements about new features on the Foursquare blog. We’ve even reported on some of them, such as the ability to create lists or to explore what’s around you.
Rather, from a personal perspective, all the new features have altered my own habits with Foursquare. I’ve changed from using it as some type of quirky gamified check-in tool to depending on it as my go-to local search tool.
Maybe it’s just me. Maybe others are having the same shift. But I wanted to share some anecdotes on how the “new” Foursquare has been working for me.

Where Should I Eat?

On one recent trip, I was heading through Dallas/Ft. Worth airport with a two hour layover and wondered if there was a BBQ place I could hit. I opened up Foursquare, used the Explore option, selected Food and quickly found a local place. Mmm, good food.
This is something I’ve written about before, how checking-in itself can be a search. John Battelle expressed it even earlier. I didn’t enter a single keyword. I just wanted to eat and used Foursquare in a tricorder-like fashion to scan what was around me.

What Should I Eat?

On another trip, I was at a restaurant and wondering what I should eat. What did others perhaps recommend? I fired up Foursquare and was pleased to discover plenty of tips on what to try.
Again, Foursquare was far more than just checking-in. Here, it was giving me recommendations on what to eat.

Nearby Specials

Recently, I was at yet another restaurant (I’ve been doing a lot of traveling recently!), talking to someone about about search. I fired up Foursquare, to show how the tool had evolved with specials that I was seeing more and more. The partnerships with Groupon, LivingSocial and others added in July are becoming more noticeable.
As it turned out, one special that came up was for $10 off on a haircut from a location right next to the restaurant. That was literally the next thing I’d planned to do that day, get my hair cut. Thanks to the Foursquare special offer — powered by Groupon — I headed over to a business I hadn’t planned on frequenting.

Mapping Tool

Yesterday, Foursquare came through yet again for me. I was swinging by TechCrunch to finally check out their offices, since I had a little time after the Twitter press event I covered yesterday.
I’d forgotten the exact address that Alexia Tsotsis gave me as I walked over, and nothing seemed to work for me to find it on Google. Then it occurred to me that I’ve seen plenty of Foursquare friends check-in to TechCrunch in the past. Foursquare must know where it is.
And it did. Opening it up quickly gave me the exact address, success where Google failed.

Foursquare: My Local Search Tool

Foursquare’s far from the only local search tool out there, of course. I could get tips and advice from others. But for me, Foursquare has “fit” well. I started out using it for the fun. Now I tap into it for the substantial information it offers. The gaming tool has been growing up, and I doubt I’m the only Foursquare user who is evolving along with it.
What especially strikes me is how much better it is than Google, in some ways. Google’s own check-in tool, Latitude, really does nothing to help me explore or find stuff around me. Google+ allows me to check-in to share, but I don’t get valuable information back about places I’m at.
More useful is the “Near Me Know” feature that rolled out in January 2010 and which expanded last June into local shortcut icons on the bottom of Google’s mobile home page. Those are useful, and can get the type of “Explore” functionality I find with Foursquare.
But for me, I don’t even think to look at those icons. Not when I’m staring already into Foursquare.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Twitter CEO Dick Costolo’s “State Of The Union” Address



Twitter CEO Dick Costolo’s “State Of The Union” Address

100 million active users. 1 billion tweets every seven days. Plans to grow the ad business. These stats and facts are part of a “State Of The Twitter” talk Twitter CEO Dick Costolo gave to the press today. Live blogging below!
Dick arrives. Nothing big, he says. “I just wanted to give you a state of the union on the business.”
He’s naming some of the people who have come on to help build the business. Jack Dorsey among those who came back in. “He speaks with the fluency of the inventor of the product,” which is good to have when you have contention between groups in the company.
“If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there,” he said at a company all hands meeting in the past. Spent time after that trying to crystalize what was unique about Twitter, not just microblogging service, social network. Decided “instantly connect people anywhere to what’s most meaningful.” I think I caught all that.
He and Jack say they want Twitter to be “The world in your pocket” … “yur world in your pocket.”
Vital signs they track. Growth, product innovation, health of business — revenue. “We should think of revenue as the way people think of breathing, it’s necessary for life but it’s not the purpose of life.”
We made a decision in November of last year, not ship any new features at all until focused on porting the infrastructure to new one on new hardware in new data center to support the scale they wanted to achieve wthout having to pause and fix things.
In summer of 2010, set records for tweets per second in the World Cup, 3100 TPS when Japan scored goal, then up to 3300 when Brazil scored later on. But other thing that happend is that they were “whaling” through fail whale errors at they call it all the time. “There was no way to get to 3400 tweets per second. We were at capacity.”
Few Sundays ago, hit 8,900 TPS per second. Irene, Beyonce, Manchester United (I think) game, all pushed traffic — and they didn’t even blink over it.
Talked before didn’t want to talk about growth numbers without a complete picture. Think has them now. We have over 100 million global actives of twitter, at least once per month. Half active users log in every day, so 50 million active every day. 55% of active users are active on mobile.
Have over 400 million monthly uniques just to Twitter.com, according to Google Analytics, up from 250 million uniques from beginning of year. There are still a lot of people who don’t log into Twitter but use it every day. Fred Wilson’s mom, for example, a story he tells about how his mom checks Fred’s twitter stream.
Global active number up over 80% since beginning of the year, that 100 million number.
Twitter as more mainstream, a stat about that. Number of people who haven’t yet tweeted. He’s excited about this stat, he says. Used to be you had a blank box only, trying to get you to tweet. Now lots of changes to try and help you find people to follow, to consume, and eventually gets people going. 40% of our active users now don’t tweet, way up from beginning of year. “We’re excited about that. I think that’s super healthy and we’ll conceive as a way to bring user” from consumption to simple publishing.
Product. One big area, I think he said (sorry, didn’t catch fully) is making the UI more consistent for mobile.
Next. Doing work to “tighten the feedback loop” and make it easier to see what people you know are doing. New activity feed is part of this, who those you know decide to follow, tweet, etc. “We’re going to be doing more and more of that.”
Now at billion tweets every five days. “There’s all this great content pouring into Twitter.” We want to surface all this content, which means surfacing the worldwide content on Twitter and then more surfacing what happens on your world on Twitter.
Doing experiments, ways to manage the timeline flow is one example, so people don’t feel they have an empty timeline. Super happy with product innovation.
Health of the business. “Great!” Promoted tweets will soon come from companies you don’t follow. “We’ve been super cautious about the expansion of our ad program.” Feel from what they’ve seen so far that ready to expand further. Promoted tweets will go beyond Twitter.com and everywhere Twitter is. “Promoted tweets will go everywhere that Twitter goes.” That means syndicated partners, clients, etc.
Ad base in US and globally grows. Just ran ad campaign for Virgin America, fly forward give back, buy a ticket, they gave X dollars to charity. That made their 5th largest sales day ever for the company, just that one ad.
Questions
People who aren’t tweeting? Dick say they’re reading timelines. Fred Wilson example again. His son uses Twitter each day on iPhone and just follows NBA players. “For him, that’s Twitter.” Just reading what peopel say.
What’s Twitter role in the marketing mix? Our users are super engaged. The 40% who don’t tweet are following accounts, reading, they are engaged. [By the way, those active users do NOT include spam accounts. Those have been filtered out, Costolo said]. The T.co change, where all traffic goes through that, helps people better understand the volume Twitter sends.
Other products that will offer to marketers? Firm believe that their platform is the only component they need to have to be an independent business. Make money now by licensing their data stream and ad revenue. We have no intention to scale the data licensing business. We’ll keep that, as it’s important that third party can use it, value in providing to them, not just altruistic. But the focus is on scaling the advertising business. “That’s the only thing we think we need to do to be a successful business.”
Promoted tweets. Didn’t catch all of it, but a white-label self-serve platform is coming.
Thoughts on Google+? I said if you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there. Said what active user number is. “It’s absolutely our goal to be on two billion devices.” To do that, you need to be simple. Google+ can no doubt pull in tons of users by bundling with search, the red notification alert, Android, YouTube.
We’re thinking about Twitter on how we can simplify the product even further. That’s what makes it different. “What can we ‘edit’ out,” to use a term that Twitter product managers say.
Platform? We said there were plenty of Twitter clients already. But wish more things for CRM like Radian 6 and ExactTarget for businesses asking Twitter for this.
One of the things will do to better promote that will be quarterly meetings, first one Sept. 14, where VC will come in along with companies they see in a particular segment.
How should advertiser consider Twitter to Facebook? You don’t pay us when someone sees something, only if they engage. Virgin America pays if someone clicks on the link. “The way advertisers should see us as providing a platform for engagement and conversation.”
Other services may declare you have to use your real name because they think they can monetize that better, we’re more interested in serving our users. [Costolo was pressed on why Twitter allows for psuedonyms].
IPO? We just recently raised “more money than I’ve ever seen before.”
Other services may declare you have to use your real name because they think they can monetize that better, we’re more interested in serving our users. [Costolo was pressed on why Twitter allows for psuedonyms].

IPO? We just recently raised “more money than I’ve ever seen before.” Could get good terms, so allows Twitter to remain independent and grow as it wants to.

Story Source :  http://searchengineland.com/live-blog-twitter-ceo-dick-costolos-informal-business-address-92207

Google Buys Zagat Ratings, Rocks Local

Google Buys Zagat Ratings, Rocks Local

Google is buying the venerable Zagat survey, which is the original local reviews provider and has been in business for more than 30 years. Terms of the deal weren’t disclosed. Rumor had it that Zagat has been “on the block” for some time, as the company increasingly struggles to compete in a world that has moved away from print.


This is huge news for Google (capital “H”) and for local. Google is a content publisher now and the content that Zagat brings arguably closes the gap between Google Places and Yelp. We’ll have to see the implementation.
Zagat’s subscription-based business model has enjoyed some success online but increasingly the company has been overshadowed by competitors like Yelp. Speaking of which, Google recently purged almost all non-Google reviews from Places profile pages after consistent complaints from Yelp and other publishers such as TripAdvisor. Now the company has a huge cache of user reviews to replace those that were “lost” in the move — and otherwise beef up its local content.
Beyond restaurants, Zagat also offers ratings and revenues of entertainment venues, wine and travel. The online version of the site has developed a community as well; so there’s a social networking dimension to this acquisition as well as content that Google is buying.
Zagat co-founders Tim and Nina Zagat said that they “will continue to be active in the business as co-Chairs, however, the merger of our resources, expertise and platforms with those of Google will give us the opportunity to greatly expand.”
There are now several questions that we’ll ask Google about when we speak to them later:
  • The majority of Zagat’s business and revenue is still tied up in print publishing and physical books. Will Google continue to publish the books?
  • Will Google eliminate the subscription part of Zagat’s site and make it free? If it doesn’t formally eliminate the subscription business it will probably, effectively make all Zagat’s reviews free because it will likely import all those reviews into Places.
  • Will Google preserve the Zagat brand and survey? At least in the near term I would assume that it must.
Google said in its blog post that “Zagat will be a cornerstone of our local offering.” Indeed. In the world of local I don’t think one can overstate the significance of this acquisition for Google and the segment as a whole.

Story Source :http://searchengineland.com/google-buys-zagat-ratings-rocks-local-92190 

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Confirmed: Bartz Out As Yahoo CEO


Details are very sparse, but All Things Digital is reporting that Carol Bartz’s rocky tenure as Yahoo CEO has ended. All Things Digital reports that current CFO Tim Morse will take over the CEO spot on an interim basis. Speculation raged earlier this summer that Bartz’ days were numbered when Yahoo announced weak Q2 financials.Details are very sparse, but All Things Digital is reporting that Carol Bartz’s rocky tenure as Yahoo CEO has ended.




    All Things Digital reports that current CFO Tim Morse will take over the CEO spot on an interim basis.
    Speculation raged earlier this summer that Bartz’ days were numbered when Yahoo announced weak Q2 financials.
    She’ll be remembered for brokering the Yahoo-Microsoft search and ads deal that effectively put Yahoo out of the search engine business (aside from display; Yahoo’s search results have been powered fully by Microsoft).
    We’ll have more on this as information becomes available.
    Postscript: Yahoo has now confirmed Bartz’ departure. The company has issued a news release saying that Yahoo’s Board of Directors removed her from the position, and appointed Morse as her interim replacement, effective immediately. There’s also a new, six-person Executive Leadership Council that will help Morse with day-to-day management and contribute to “a comprehensive strategic review that the Board has initiated to position the Company for future growth.”
    Roy Bostock, Chairman of the Yahoo! Board, said, “The Board sees enormous growth opportunities on which Yahoo! can capitalize, and our primary objective is to leverage the Company’s leadership and current business assets and platforms to execute against these opportunities. We have talented teams and tremendous resources behind them and intend to return the Company to a path of robust growth and industry-leading innovation. We are committed to exploring and evaluating possibilities and opportunities that will put Yahoo! on a trajectory for growth and innovation and deliver value to shareholders.”
    On a related note, Glassdoor — a site where employees can share information and opinions about companies anonymously — says Bartz’ approval rating was at 33% for the 3rd quarter of 2011, and had dropped as low as 24% during Q2 (based on those employees who chose to speak out on the site).
    For more background on Bartz’ tenure at Yahoo, see the related articles listed below.

    Original Source:http://searchengineland.com/bartz-reportedly-out-as-yahoo-ceo-91929

    Twitter Renews Deal With Bing; Google Deal Remains MIA

    Twitter and Bing announced that they have extended their deal that allows Bing to tap into Twitter’s information in a cutesy exchange on Twitter itself. As for Google, which Twitter’s been on the outs with since July, Twitter says there’s no similar happy news to report.

    Dear Twitter, I Love You! Kisses, Bing

    Twitter spokesperson Carolyn Penner compiled the exchange using the awesome Storify service, as you’ll find here:

    It’s perhaps the first press release via Twitter conversation that I know of.

    Details? You Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Details!

    But how about details? How long is the deal for? Is Microsoft paying $30 million for it, as AllThingsD reported to be rumored earlier this year?
    A Microsoft spokesperson told me simply:
    I can confirm that Bing is extending its collaboration with Twitter. We are not disclosing terms of the deal.
    Interestingly, when I last asked Microsoft about its deal with Twitter back in July, I was told:
    We won’t disclose the terms of the deal, but it’s a long term arrangement that we’re pleased with, and plan to keep in place as long as it’s delivering benefit for people who use Bing.
    With the two companies announcing a renewal, that suggests it wasn’t as “long term” as Microsoft had said. AllThingsD pegged it as expiring around the end of the year; it was announced in October 2009, so a two-year October 2011 expiration date certainly made sense.

    Google Who?

    Meanwhile, what about Google? There’s a little slam against Google in that conversation above:
    @bing Totally! Search w/o Twitter = old news. You & @MSN are amazing at using Tweets to make search better & help people stay in the know.
    Ouch! Google without Twitter equals old news. I asked Penner if there was news on the Google front. “Nope.”
    That, along with the tweet exchange, makes me think that Twitter and Google are more apart on renewing than ever. I have asked Google for an update, but I haven’t gotten a reply yet.

    Google Surviving Life Without Twitter

    Of course, Google’s largely come through not having Google Realtime Search with few issues. The company has told me plenty of journalists sorely miss the tool, which was mainly powered by Twitter’s information. But ordinary users seem not to have noticed.
    During the recent East Coast earthquake, I also did a spot check shortly after the news to see if the lack of tweets in Google’s search results had an impact. A little, but I was still finding pretty fresh information.
    Overall, the staring game between the two companies seems likely to continue. I think Google is a lot better with Twitter information. Indeed, given that Google did a huge press event around the launch of Google Realtime Search, now acting like it’s not so important seems pretty odd. Unless, it turns out, it’s not — and the launch was simply hype.
    At the very least, you’d expect Google at this point to relaunch Google Realtime Search with content from Google+ as a replacement. Not being able to search through content on Google’s own social network, from a company that specializes in search, is pretty absurd.
    Google Realtime Search wasn’t just Twitter search, and the ability to use Google to search through content on other social networks got axed when Google closed it. So bring it back, even if it comes back without Twitter — and get moving on that Google+ search feature.
    Twitter’s Where On Bing?
    As for Bing, search without Twitter isn’t old news. It’s old, old news. Bing’s had a deal with Twitter since October 2009, and that deal hasn’t really seemed to do much to attract visitors over to Bing.
    Indeed, unlike Google’s implementation, you can be hard-pressed to find tweets being visible. For example, in a search on “twitter” at Bing, I don’t see today’s conversation between Bing and Twitter appearing at all:
    I do get ordinary news results near the bottom of the page, but I don’t get any actual tweets. Nor do a I get a link to Bing Social Search – the primary way to find tweets on Bing — via the Bing menu at the top of the page. In contrast, when Google offered Google Realtime Search, this type of link was prominent.

    Congrats, Topsy

    Overall, the real winner in this remains Topsy. If you’re trying to find tweets beyond a day or more, Topsy is your best resource, even over Bing. For more on that, and the backstory of the Twitter-Google deal not being renewed, see my stories below:
    • As Deal With Twitter Expires, Google Realtime Search Goes Offline
    • Google Realtime Search & The Aftermath Of The Google-Twitter Split
    Postscript: I’ve now heard back from Google, which tells me:
    We’ve temporarily disabled google.com/realtime. We’re exploring how to incorporate the Google+ project into this functionality going forward, so stay tuned.
    Original SOurce : http://searchengineland.com/twitter-renews-deal-with-bing-google-deal-remains-mia-91928

    Sunday, August 14, 2011

    Google+ Makes Splash in Social Sector, But Will It Last

    Google+ has been on quite a ride in its first 6 weeks of existence. It obtained 10 million users in just two weeks and is now said to have over 20 million users. The overall reaction has been positive, but since the platform is currently invitation-only, the early adopters have mostly been the tech savvy crowd.
    First Impressions of Google+
    Everyone knows that first impressions are vital, so how did Google+ do? WebProNews posed this question to numerous search and social media leaders and received a variety of responses. Loren Baker, the Vice President of Services at BlueGlass, told us that Google+ felt like a “private version of Facebook” but with a better user interface. He also pointed out that it had given people the ability to “reset” as far as selecting who to include in circles and who not to include.
    When Facebook opened to the general public, most users tried to get as many friends as possible regardless of whether a relationship existed or not. Baker believes that people have gotten smarter now and are using Google+ more selectively.
    Social media speaker and author Mari Smith added that there seemed to be a “different vibe inside Google+” since users were sharing more and having “more thoughtful conversation.”
    One interesting aspect that Lee Odden, the CEO of TopRank Online Marketing, noticed was that it appeared to be a big traffic driver. What’s even more interesting is that the amount of time that users spent on his site to read the post he had shared was 4 times the amount that people were staying when they came from Facebook or Twitter. He said that this data was especially noteworthy since Facebook and Twitter were usually strong sources of quality traffic.
    Google Makes Progress in Social
    Although Google has struggled to get into the social space, Google+ appears to be its golden ticket. As many people have pointed out, the platform looks very similar to Facebook and has similar sharing aspects as well. However, it seems to flow more like Twitter.
    At this point, it looks like Google+ is trying to re-produce the features that users favor on the other networks, expand on them somewhat, and also capitalize on their shortcomings. Steve Rubel, the EVP of Global Strategy and Insights for Edelman, told us that these developments have created a different type of social experience that is peaking the interest of users.
    “This is their first entry that they’ve had that is really serious [and] that people are really using a lot,” he said. “It’s a very open approach that I wish others would take.”
    On the other hand, Li Evans, the CEO and Co-founder of LiBeck Integrated Marketing, told us that, while Google+ is a better attempt at social than its previous efforts, its value proposition is still lacking.
    “What is the value proposition? What do I get from Google+?” she asked.
    She went on to say that, at this point, she did not see the same value on Google+ that she sees in Facebook and LinkedIn.
    Google+ Vs. Facebook, LinkedIn & Twitter
    Because of the positive feedback that the platform has gotten, it is only natural that people are questioning how Google+ will faceoff against the other social networks. Tech analyst Rob Enderle recently told us that Facebook had an advantage over Google+ since it had the majority of users.
    But, as we all know, Myspace was the biggest social network when Facebook began. Enderle indicated that, if Facebook wasn’t careful, it could fall to Google+, just as Myspace did to it.
    While Barry Schwartz, the CEO of RustyBrick, speaks very highly of Google+, he doesn’t think that Facebook has anything to worry about.
    “I don’t think Google+ will kill Facebook going forward, I think, Facebook will still be very strong… probably the strongest player in that market,” he said.
    Rubel doesn’t see Facebook dying to Google+ either. He thinks it has promise but said he had some doubts too.
    “There’s no doubt that it’s going to be a strong #3 or #4,” said Rubel. “Whether it goes mainstream… the jury’s out. I don’t see that happening so fast.”
    Smith also agreed that Facebook should not be worried about Google+. She did, however, say that, while it would always be an important player, she could see Facebook losing its #1 spot in the social space.
    “If Facebook could just launch a powerful search engine, it would be fierce competition right back at ya for Google,” she said.
    She went to say that Twitter, even though it needed improvements, was also a valuable product that would not likely fall to Google+.
    Odden believes that Twitter is very effective as well for both business and personal usage. He explained to us that the propagation that happens on Twitter is very different that the closed environment of Google+
    “Google+ is all about Google,” he said. “It’s not about propagating externally so much, whereas Twitter, is completely wide open.”
    He did add that, if Twitter and Facebook were smart, they would find ways to work with Google+.
    Incidentally, Facebook has seemingly responded to Google+ with its group chat release and video chat feature. It also announced a new page called Facebook for Business, which some believe was to counter Google’s shut down of business accounts.
    When Google+ does roll out its business option, Baker told us that he could see it having a “competitive advantage” over Facebook if it incorporates Google products such as Deals, Latitude, and Places. He also said that if Google+ is fully integrated into mobile devices and Android, it could have the same penetration that Gmail has. Since Android dominates the mobile market, he thinks that Google+ has the potential to grow exponentially.
    Wishlist of Further Development
    Despite its extensive growth rate, Google+ has had its problems in its short existence. There have been privacy concerns in regards to user names, and there was also disappointment that the service launched without support for many Google Apps. The lack of business product was, of course, another basis for complaint.
    So, what else would people like to see from Google+? Baker told us that he has had issues with Google+ since he has both a personal Gmail account and an apps Gmail account. For this reason, he would like for Google to converge the two accounts together.
    On the topic of search, he said he would like more integration of Google+ into the search results. He suggested that Google cater search results based on each users’ Circles.
    Evans and Odden both told us they would like to see more sharing capabilities. Rubel also said that the mobile experience has to improve. He would like to have Hangouts move beyond 10 people as well.
    Smith believes that Sparks needs a lot of work. Additionally, she wants Google to allow developers to have access to its API in order to create tools and other features on top of the platform.
    Odden said he understood that Google was trying to produce a product especially for businesses, but he thinks that, in the mean time, businesses should be allowed to have a profile. As he explained, Google could then give them a migration tool to transfer information, once a business option is available.
    Google definitely has a ways to go, but it’s clear that the company is dedicated to Google+ and succeeding in the social space.
    “Google has not said this is a fully baked product,” said Rubel. “They’ve said it’s a field trial patience is a virtue.”

    Story Link : http://www.webpronews.com/google-makes-splash-in-social-sector-but-will-it-last-2011-08

    Friday, August 12, 2011

    Facebook Adds Targeting By Zip Codes To Advertisements

    Facebook Adds Targeting By Zip Codes To Advertisements

    Up til now, Facebook Ads could be targeted by Country, State/Province and by City. Yesterday Facebook added an additional targeting type, by zip code:

    This is a big deal for Facebook marketing, as it is now much more attractive for local businesses. Local business owners can now target the exact zip codes where they draw from, and can stop wasting clicks on areas in the city that are far away from their physical presence. This is currently only active in the U.S.

    In AdWords user can append a radius around the zip code where ads should be shown to give users more proximity options. This is simply not feasible with the new Facebook targeting option. This means that local marketers should ensure that every single zip they draw from is included in this targeting feature.

    Update Made To Definition Of A Google Analytics Session

    Update Made To Definition Of A Google Analytics Session
    Google Analytics announced a change on the way a sessions are calculated on the tool. While this change will not affect the majority of the accounts significantly (according to the official blog post “most users will see less than a 1% change”), it is an important change.
    Below, I will describe why it is important and how this can affect some Google Analytics accounts (mostly companies that misuse Google Analytics campaign parameters), and what you can do to make sure you are on the right track.

    What Is Changing & Why?

    According to the official post, here is a summary of how Google Analytics has ended a session up till now:
    • Greater than 30 minutes have elapsed between pageviews for a single user
    • At the end of a day
    • When a user closes their browser
    In the new model, Google Analytics will end a session when:
    • Greater than 30 minutes have elapsed between pageviews for a single user
    • At the end of a day
    • When any campaign information for the user changes. Campaign information includes: utm_source, utm_medium, utm_term, utm_content, utm_id, utm_campaign and auto-tagging from AdWords (gclid)
    This change is an interesting move as it will provide more accurate data when it comes to Multi-Channel Attribution. This will happen because visitors that visit a website multiple times during a time period that would originally be considered as one single session, will now have their cookies updated to a new session in some specific situations.
    For example, if someone visits a website from a PPC ad and then leaves the site and within 10 minutes get back to the website through an organic link would be considered as one long visit from PPC in the old model. In the new model, we would have two short visits, each attributed to its own source.

    Do Not Use Campaign Parameters For In-Site Tracking

    One of the mistakes I have seen when it comes to implementing Google Analytics is the usage of Campaign Parameters for in-site tracking (mostly tracking navigation usage or internal campaigns).
    This practice produces inaccurate numbers for those analyzing in-site behavior and also heavily affects traffic sources accuracy and, therefore, should never be used. Now even more. With the current update to how sessions are defined, each time a visitor clicks on an internal link that uses campaign parameters, a new session starts; this will artificially increases the number of visits in addition to the issues I described above.
    If you are currently using campaign parameters to track in-site behavior, here is what you should do:
    1. Remove all campaign parameters from your links. For example, if you have a link on your site such as searchengineland.com?utm_source=story&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=launch , you should simply use searchengineland.com
    2. If you are tracking navigation elements on the site. Using Event Tracking is the best way to go: add an onclick event to the “a” tag that would include the following: onclick=”_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'navigation', 'link', 'launch']);”
    3. If you are tracking internal campaigns. Using Custom Variables is the best way to go: add an onclick event to the “a” tag that would include the following: onclick=”_gaq.push(['_setCustomVar', 5, 'internal_campaign', 'banner', 2]);” . It is important to note that you should check with other people involved in setting Google Analytics to be sure spot 5 (the first value on the function above) is available for campaign tracking.
    The above techniques will certainly provide you with accurate numbers in the best possible way without affecting your reports.

    Story Courtesy : http://searchengineland.com/update-made-to-definition-of-a-google-analytics-session-89300

    Google’s Panda Update Launches Internationally in Most Languages

    Google’s Panda Update Launches Internationally in Most Languages

    Google has just announced that their “Panda” rankings changes, first launched in the United States in late February and rolled out to English language indices internationally in April, have now launched internationally in all languages other than Chinese, Japanese, and Korean.
    Their post notes that for non-English indices, this change impacts 6-9% of queries (vs. the 12% the original US English launch). This launch also includes a few minor changes to the English version of Panda, but shouldn’t have a substantial impact.
    In their post, they say:
    For many months, we’ve been focused on trying to return high-quality sites to users. Earlier this year, we rolled out our “Panda” change for searches in English around the world. Today we’re continuing that effort by rolling out our algorithmic search improvements in different languages. Our scientific evaluation data show that this change improves our search quality across the board, and the response to Panda from users has been very positive.
    I talked to Google about the change and they reiterated that searchers overwhelmingly have found the Panda-based changes to improve their search results and that those impacted should evaluate their sites objectively for quality and unique value.
    This year, Google has focused on identifying sites with a large number of low quality pages as part of their overall goal of providing the best possible search experience. The Panda updates have been evolutions of algorithms that increasingly detect this and lower those sites in search rankings. I often describe it as somewhat like the Adwords quality score, which uses a number of factors to assign an overall score to a site. Since we’re talking about algorithms with many inputs, there’s no one thing that can cause a site to lose rankings due to Panda. Rather it’s an accumulation of factors.
    Imagine you’re eating an ice cream sundae. The ice cream is delicious and creamy. It’s covered in the best hot fudge sauce you’ve ever eaten. The whipped cream is freshly made from scratch. On top is an OK-tasting cherry. How do you feel about the sundae overall? Pretty good? Excellent even?
    Now, imagine another ice cream sundae. It’s made with that blech tasting cardboard-and-ice style ice cream. The hot fudge is missing entirely. And the whipped cream is that scary fake stuff from a can. The cherry, however, is quite good. How do you feel about this sundae?
    The maker of the second sundae might ask why it is you’ve put down your spoon and are edging back to the sundae #1. But the cherry is better! He might say. A Rainier cherry from Washington state! How can you like the other sundae better when it has such a sub-par cherry? Mine has all of the same parts as that sundae! Well, except the hot fudge!
    Google is taste-testing ice cream sundaes and offering searchers the ones that are the best holistically. I mean, they’re not literally eating ice cream. (Actually, they are, but not as part of this metaphor.) I’m just saying you can’t look for one specific thing to fix and you can’t compare one specific thing on your site to that same thing on another site. There are too many moving parts.

    The History of Panda

    This post covers all of the Panda updates leading up to this one. That post also recaps the articles we’ve published here with advice and impact. The last update was about three weeks ago and was fairly minor.

    Advice If Your Site Has Lost Ranking

    Panda seems to be focused primarily on unique value and user experience. I gave a long interview to Eric Enge about this not too long ago. If your site has lost search traffic due to Panda, take an objective look (or better yet, have someone else take an objective look) and ask:
    • How does the content quality compare to other pages on the web about the same topic? Is the page the most valuable and useful content about the topic?
    • Do multiple pages on the site answer the same problem/focus on the same basic task? It’s one thing to have separate pages on “best chocolate cake recipe” and “best pumpkin pie recipe” and quote another to have separate pages on “best chocolate cake recipe” and “ideal chocolate cake recipe”.
    • Is the content primarily syndicated or aggregated from other sources? If most of the content isn’t original, Google’s algorithms might give the site a lower “quality score” (in quotes because I totally made that up that way of looking at Panda — I’m not saying Google internally is using the concept of a quality score) to better ensure that the original version ranks.
    • If the content is unique, does it completely cover the topic in a credible, useful way or is it shallow and barely scratch the surface?
    • Does the user interface design and navigation make engagement easy or are things cluttered and make it difficult for visitors to find what they’re looking for?
    • Are the site design and goals user-focused or revenue-focused? It’s absolutely fine (and generally necessary if you’re running a business!) to ensure that your site makes money. But if the goals you keep in mind when designing the pages don’t take into account how well the visitor can get what they need (an answer to their question, ability to accomplish their task easily) and 0nly are based on getting what you want from users (ad views or clicks, for instance), the user experience of your pages might not be ideal.
    Since Panda is based on an overall ice cream sundae score, you likely won’t see rankings improvements right away once you make changes. Google periodically recalculates these scores (just like they periodically launch a new version of Panda with improved signals), so after you make changes, you’ ll have to wait for Google to recrawl the site so they can take note of the changes (you can check the cache dates of your indexed pages to see if Google has recrawled them) and then you’ ll have to wait for one of Google’s periodic scoring recalculations (which so far seem to coincide with Panda algorithm updates).
    Some site owners who have made substantial changes based on the bullets above have seen positive results (I’ve worked with some of them and seen the analytics myself), but a recovery isn’t likely overnight.

    Chat with us

    Live Chat Software for Website

     
    Design by Wordpress Theme | Bloggerized by Free Blogger Templates |